Abstract: The orthodox literature on social capital is strongly focused on the positive effects of networks and the behavioural norms that support them. As a result, joining behaviour and the development of normative societal aspirations are the hallmarks of policies and programs focused on building social capital. In many situations however, high levels of social capital can function to exclude individuals and groups from resources and perpetuate norms which restrict individual freedom. Unsurprisingly, social capital has proved not to be the quick, cheap solution to social problems many once imagined. This research aims to explore how social capital is therefore better conceived of as a value-neutral, or multivalent resource, and heavily dependent on geographic, socio-economic and cultural factors for it's development and operation. In order to explore the validity of this interpretation, fieldwork was conducted at two locations with Indigenous students enrolled in tertiary preparation, vocational or higher education programs. A number of methods were employed, including a participant-driven photo-elicitation project. This paper will discuss the preliminary results from this research, including the relative success of the mixed-method approach adopted.

Nikki Stephenson is a descendant of the Kamillaroi nation, and holds a BA in Anthropology & International Relations, with First Class Honours in Political Science from the University of Queensland. Nikki is currently undertaking a PhD in Sociology at ANU, which focuses on heterodox interpretations of social capital, and the relationship between social and other forms of capital.